| Welcome to the Crisis Management Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. This board is for the discussion of all things involving corporate crisis management: strategies, best practices, crisis plans, mock disasters, media training, etc. It is also a place to follow and discuss current crises in the news, and the news media itself. This is a forum about preparing for and managing media crises, and a place to review, critique and discuss how real crises are being managed, or not managed. This is a forum not only for communications professionals, students and educators, but for anyone who has found that the ability to manage crises is an important part of their job. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Murdoch may block Google searches; Trying to charge for news again | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 12 2009, 10:57 PM (280 Views) | |
| Alton Lagan | Nov 12 2009, 10:57 PM Post #1 |
|
In a story I first read about in my Google News RSS Feed, Rupert Murdoch is angry that Google is linking to his news for free.
Full story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8351331.stm The idea of charging for online news is not new, it was tried extensively in the '90s and was largely a flop. What was discovered was when content exist for free online, the quality of the free content must be vastly inferior for paid content to compete with it. As the example of Wikipedia has shown, free content only has to be 'good enough' for it to be chosen over paid content. And as the critics of Wikipedia soon discovered, all the inaccuracies they liked to point out, soon because of the the power of Wikipedia on the web, became the new truth. Not fixing inaccuracies in Wikipedia did not kill it, instead it made a lot of people believe stuff that wasn't true. Soon an essential part of public relations was making sure your Wikipedia entry was correct. I do not believe Murdoch's attempts are going to be successful. If your stories do not turn up in a Google search they might as well not even exist on the web. However, it does look like a last attempt of the old media to hang on in the new media. In the end my money is on Google. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General news media discussion · Next Topic » |







10:52 PM Feb 4